-
January 30th, 2001, 01:20 PM
#21
Inactive Member
You define defending human rights issues as (bitching)??....have you ever thought of getting involved in rightwing politics?? I think with your apparent mindset on liberty you'd fit right in.
-
January 30th, 2001, 10:15 PM
#22
Inactive Member
-------------------------------------------------------->human rights
-
January 31st, 2001, 08:31 AM
#23
Inactive Member
Again PSNOR you don't seem to be grasping the the premise of this thread. It wasn't about whether Bush jnr is a stand up guy, (incidently Bush couldn't be a stand up guy even if he had a 6 foot splint rammed down the back of his shirt collar) it was about the withdrawl of human rights and forcing the clock back years on hard fought liberty.
I still query why, firstly you questioned why non American people were posting about American politics and secondly why you question why I am talking about abortion when I don't have first hand knowledge. Human rights concern everyone, nationality is inconsequential.
You said you've had first hand knowledge of abortion. At least you had the right to it however traumatic it was for you. Imagine if a few years down the line you were in the same position and you were sitting in some grubby backstreet butchers surgery, tell me honestly if you think that is a viable option??
Abortion is a very sensitive and emotive issue but banning legal abortions, withdrawing funding and prosecuting people does not make the issue go away. A blinkered, lock-down attitude will cause untold chaos and suffering and set freedom of choice and civil liberites back years.
-
February 1st, 2001, 10:56 PM
#24
Inactive Member
I gotta ask, what if out arbitrary pick for when life starts is wrong, and the "fetus" is actually a life? DOes it have human rights?
-
February 2nd, 2001, 02:58 AM
#25
Inactive Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Times New Roman">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by R@nt In~E~Minor:
This restriction... prohibits international nongovernmental family planning organizations from receiving U.S. funds if, with their own separate funds, they engage in legal abortion-related activities, including talking with clients about abortion, disseminating information about abortion, or engaging in advocacy to change or reform abortion laws. By putting at risk these organizations ability to serve their clients, this policy curtails their ability to offer all appropriate medical care and fully exercise their right to free expression.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Get it??!
-
February 2nd, 2001, 03:08 AM
#26
-
February 2nd, 2001, 06:57 PM
#27
HB Forum Owner
NEXT!!!!!
------------------
Everyone thinks i am insane.... all but my friends deep inside the earth......
-
February 2nd, 2001, 08:55 PM
#28
Inactive Member
I get it. And I like it. I don't want my tax dollars going to support what I believe is murder. It doesn't take away the right to free expression, just the right to have it paid for. Nobody is banning any practices, just tax payer funds for them.
-
February 2nd, 2001, 10:01 PM
#29
-
February 5th, 2001, 04:12 AM
#30
Inactive Member
Sam Sam Sam Sam Sam.....this is my point. You care more about your precious dollar more than human suffering. Have you any idea how many children are dying because US sanctions will not allow medical supplies into countries?? but it's ok because it's not on your turf right??
I'm sure an abused or raped woman would appreciate being called a murderer Sam.
People are not robots, shit happens, people fuck up...they don't need a prick on a moral high-horse calling them a murderer.
Try feeding, clothing and loving the people already in the world before you accuse the rest.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks